Politics in Islam (37): Shura and Leadership in Islam: Between Divine Command and Public Legitimacy
Some concepts are often repeated to the point that they lose their depth. Shura—consultation in governance—is one such idea. It is well known that Islam emphasizes consultation in decision-making, but how often do we stop to reflect on the precise way the Qur’an presents it?
The phrasing matters. The divine language carries meaning beyond mere instruction. When Allah speaks of the believers, He says:
"And their affairs are (decided) by consultation among them." (Surah Ash-Shura 42:38)
This is not just a general endorsement of consultation; it is a definition. Who has the right to be consulted? Those whose affairs are being decided. The authority to participate in Shura is not arbitrary—it belongs to those who are affected by the decision.
The Scope of Shura: Who Has the Right to Decide?
Imagine a nation choosing its leader. The decision affects every citizen—their security, economy, and daily life. By Qur’anic logic, the people collectively hold the right to elect their ruler. However, if a group of teachers is selecting their union leader, this is not a national matter—the authority to choose belongs to the teachers alone. Shura is not about an abstract right to be consulted; it is about ensuring that those who are impacted by a decision have a voice in making it.
This principle prevents two extremes:
-
Totalitarianism, where decisions are imposed without consultation.
-
Chaotic populism, where everyone claims authority over matters that do not concern them.
Islamic governance is structured—consultation must be widespread where necessary and localized where appropriate.
Shura vs. Mashawara: A Subtle Yet Critical Difference
A closer look at the Qur’anic wording reveals another layer of meaning.
Allah commands the Prophet ﷺ:
"Consult them in matters, and when you have decided, then put your trust in Allah." (Surah Aal-e-Imran 3:159)
The verb used here is شاورهم (shawirhum), meaning "engage in consultation with them." The noun Shura, however, is used differently—"Their affairs are decided by Shura among them."
This difference is not accidental. In Arabic, verbs that follow the pattern of فاعَلَ (such as شاور) imply a process of mutual engagement (mashawara). Meanwhile, the noun Shura refers to a system—a governing principle that applies to an entire society.
-
The Prophet ﷺ was commanded to consult (mashawara) because he was divinely appointed and needed only to consider people's views, not derive his legitimacy from them.
-
The Muslim community, however, was commanded to govern by Shura—because their leadership and authority come from their collective decision.
This distinction explains why prophets are never chosen by election. Their legitimacy is not granted by the people; it is directly from Allah. That is why the Qur’an says:
"Whoever obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah." (Surah An-Nisa 4:80)
For prophets, following them is part of faith itself. Rejecting their leadership is not just political dissent; it is disbelief.
But for rulers other than prophets, authority does not come from divine appointment. It comes from the people. Any leader who claims "divine right to rule"—as some European kings did under the doctrine of the divine right of kings—is fabricating a false claim.
Islam recognizes no such doctrine. The only figures who are divinely appointed are the prophets. Every other leader must derive legitimacy from the people, through consultation and representation.
Why Political Stability Requires Shura
The importance of Shura is not just a philosophical point—it is a practical necessity. A society without consultation in governance is either:
-
A dictatorship, where power is monopolized by force.
-
A fragmented society, where individual opinions override collective decisions, leading to chaos.
Islam does not allow either scenario. That is why the Prophet ﷺ emphasized:
"It is obligatory upon a Muslim to listen and obey in what he likes and dislikes, unless he is ordered to commit a sin. If he is ordered to sin, then he should neither listen nor obey." (Sahih al-Bukhari & Muslim)
A person may disagree with a decision, but once the Ummah has decided, they must abide by it. However, obedience is not blind—if the leader commands sin, there is no duty to obey.
This is the balance of Islamic political philosophy:
-
Unity in decision-making, so the community does not descend into disorder.
-
A limit on authority, so obedience does not turn into servitude.
Thus, Shura is not just consultation—it is the foundation of legitimate political power in Islam. It ensures that leadership is not imposed but earned, and that governance remains accountable to those it serves.
Comments
Post a Comment